A.
Successful money laundering allows criminal to access the banking system
and legitimize their funds. Denied access to the banking system, criminals
would be forced to utilize cash. Cash transactions are considered a
warning sign, and may lead to suspicion and detection by the authorities.
Q. How is
money laundering done?
A:
That depends on a range of factors: the amount of money in question,
how 'dirty' it is, if it is a recurring stream of dirty money that needs
to be laundered or just a one-off transaction. It depends on the efforts
of law-enforcement and on the laundering-infrastructure available. It
also depends on what is to be done with the money afterwards. To make
it short: The available methods range from very simple to very confusing,
complicated and elaborate.
Fortunately,
one can abstract from all these tedious complications of reality and then
arrive at a fairly simple model that captures the essence of the process.
Ideally, money laundering consists of three phases: placement, layering
and integration.
During
the placement phase, the money enters the financial system. Dirty money
often begins its existence in the form of cash and big quantities of cash
raise suspicions. Thus, the first task is to convert the cash into book
money. Once the money has entered the financial system, the layering starts.
The tracks now have to be covered - to delete the past or the illegitimate
origins. To do this, they commingle the dirty money with legitimate funds
and send it on a journey across the world, by way of wire transfer. After
they have accomplished this task, it is time for the integration. It is
good to know that one has a lot of money in a bank account in, say, Nauru,
but it is even better if it can be spent. For this, a plausible explanation
is needed as to why these funds are owned. Otherwise, suspicions will
be raised, ruining the whole effort.
As
stated earlier - this is a stylized model. In reality- maybe more often
than not - examples of money laundering work quite differently. But then
again, the launderer is not interested in meeting the requirements of
a law-enforcement model.
Q.
Why fight money laundering?
A.
First of all: a world without money laundering would be a world with significantly
less crime. There are mainly two reasons for this conclusion. Firstly,
most crime is committed to obtain an (illegal) profit. Since it would
be much more difficult to enjoy these profits without money laundering,
the incentive for committing crimes of that sort should be significantly
reduced. Secondly, money laundering allows for more sophisticated investment
of criminally obtained money, thus boosting the financial resources of
criminal groups.
A
related argument states that by investigating money laundering we are
able to systematically unravel the networks and/or hierarchies of organized
crime groups. The "money-trail" leads us to the bosses in the
background who do not get directly involved with the criminal activities
that generate the profits.
If left unchecked, criminal money will slowly infiltrate the 'legal' economy
and in the end will threaten the integrity of the whole society. Whereas
a more narrowly economic argument warns that the enormous amounts of dirty
money injected into the international financial markets may destabilize
the financial system or even be employed to exert pressure on national
governments by threatening to speculate against the national currency.
Q.
What is the responsibility of the banking system?
A.
All financial institutions are required to monitor transactions to detect
money laundering activities within their institutions and for certain
products such as funds transfer between other financial institutions,
in the United States and overseas. Financial institutions include commercial
banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, thrift institutions,
foreign banks, credit card companies, casinos, some insurance companies
and brokerage houses. The list of entities regulated for money laundering
continues to expand each year.
The
synopsis of the main regulations and their requirement follows below.
Please note this is not a complete list of requirements. Under the various
laws enacted by the United States Congress, financial institutions are
required to implement an Anti Money Laundering (AML) Program. The primary
regulation is the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), which was designed to help identify
the source, volume, and movement of currency and other monetary instruments
transported or transmitted into or out of the United States or deposited
in financial institutions. The BSA stipulates that minimum components
for this program are (1) a system of internal controls to ensure ongoing
compliance, (2) independent testing of these internal controls, (3) designation
of an individual or individuals responsible for managing BSA compliance
(the BSA Compliance Officer), and (4) training for appropriate personnel.
There are both criminal and civil penalties for BSA violations. Subsequent
legislation has amended and strengthened the BSA.
Additionally, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate
Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT
Act) establishes identification procedures for opening new accounts, including
in certain circumstances, new accounts for existing customers as well
as for new customers.
The
Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) publishes lists of countries and
foreign nationals with whom the US and any US entity or individual is
prohibited from doing business. Customers must routinely be screened against
the OFAC list to make sure that we do not conduct business with these
entities. Similarly, funds transfers must be screened to ensure that activity
going through your bank does not include any sanctioned countries or individuals.
Q.
How does a bank develop a risk assessment?
A.
An AML risk assessment is a unique picture of the institution’s
potential exposure for money laundering risk. A risk assessment is based
on the institution’s unique set of customers, products, and geographic
indicators. Your institution’s risk assessment determines what key
internal controls are needed for your AML program.
With
the publication of the new examination manual, this risk assessment is
a requirement for all financial institutions. If the institution does
not prepare one, the examination team is required prepare one for the
AML exam
Q.
What are the penalties for noncompliance?
A.
The penalties for noncompliance are substantial. They are both civil and
criminal. Recent penalty actions have included those against small banks,
thrifts and credit unions, as well as some of America’s largest
banks. The penalties range from a few thousand dollars to fifty million.
Additionally, the reputation risk exposure for any individual institution
simply cannot be calculated. The impact of negative publicity to the customer
and potential customers for lack of compliance is substantial. In some
cases, this lack of compliance can result in imprisonment of bank officers
and board members and revocation of the bank’s charter.
|